In this section, we will present some of the most basic theorems of group theory. Keep in mind that each of these theorems tells us something about every group. We will illustrate this point with concrete examples at the close of the section.
One difficulty that students often encounter is how to get started in proving a theorem like this. The difficulty is certainly not in the theorem’s complexity. It’s too terse! Before actually starting the proof, we rephrase the theorem so that the implication it states is clear.
The same problem is encountered here as in the previous theorem. We will leave it to the reader to rephrase this theorem. The proof is also left to the reader to write out in detail. Here is a hint: If and are both inverses of , then you can prove that . If you have difficulty with this proof, note that we have already proven it in a concrete setting in Chapter 5.
As mentioned above, the significance of Theorem 11.3.3 is that we can refer to the inverse of an element without ambiguity. The notation for the inverse of is usually (note the exception below).
In a concrete group with an operation that is based on addition, the inverse of is usually written . For example, the inverse of in the group is written . In the group of matrices over the real numbers under matrix addition, the inverse of is written , which equals .
The next theorem gives us a formula for the inverse of , referred generically here as a “product.” This formula should be familiar. In Chapter 5 we saw that if and are invertible matrices, then .
We will prove the left cancellation law. The right law can be proved in exactly the same way. Starting with , we can operate on both and on the left with :
Applying the associative property to both sides we get
In a group with addition, we use a different form of notation, reflecting the fact that in addition repeated terms are multiples, not powers. For example, in , is written as , is written as , etc. The inverse of a multiple of such as is written as .
Based on the definitions for exponentiation above, there are several properties that can be proven. They are all identical to the exponentiation properties from elementary algebra.
We will leave the proofs of these properties to the reader. All three parts can be done by induction. For example the proof of the second part would start by defining the proposition , , to be for all . The basis is .
Consider the concrete group . All of the theorems that we have stated in this section except for the last one say something about . Among the facts that we conclude from the theorems about are:
by the associativity of integer addition by the definition of exponentiation by the induction hypothesis by associativity by the definition of exponentiation
To complete the proof, you need to consider the cases where and/or are negative.
Each of the following facts can be derived by identifying a certain group and then applying one of the theorems of this section to it. For each fact, list the group and the theorem that are used.