How does knowing just the tangent line approximation tell us information about the behavior of the original function itself near the point of approximation? How does knowing the second derivative’s value at this point provide us additional knowledge of the original function’s behavior?
Among all functions, linear functions are simplest. One of the powerful consequences of a function being differentiable at a point is that, up close, the function is locally linear and looks like its tangent line at that point. In certain circumstances, this allows us to approximate the original function with a simpler function that is linear: this can be advantageous when we have limited information about or when is computationally or algebraically complicated. We will explore all of these situations in what follows.
It is essential to recall that when is differentiable at , the value of provides the slope of the tangent line to at the point . If we know both a point on the line and the slope of the line we can find the equation of the tangent line and write the equation in point-slope form 1
Recall that a line with slope that passes through has equation , and this is the point-slope form of the equation.
Given a function that is differentiable at , we know that we can determine the slope of the tangent line to at by computing . The equation of the resulting tangent line is given in point-slope form by
or.
Note well: there is a major difference between and in this context. The former is a constant that results from using the given fixed value of , while the latter is the general expression for the rule that defines the function. The same is true for and : we must carefully distinguish between these expressions. Each time we find the tangent line, we need to evaluate the function and its derivative at a fixed -value.
In Figure 1.8.1, we see the graph of a function and its tangent line at the point . Notice how when we zoom in we see the local linearity of more clearly highlighted. The function and its tangent line are nearly indistinguishable up close. Local linearity can also be seen dynamically in this applet 2
Figure1.8.1.A function and its tangent line at the point : at left, from a distance, and at right, up close. At right, we label the tangent line function by and observe that for near ,.
A slight change in perspective and notation will enable us to be more precise in discussing how the tangent line approximates near . By solving for , we can write the equation for the tangent line as
This line is itself a function of . Replacing the variable with the expression , we call
the local linearization of at the point . In this notation, is nothing more than a new name for the tangent line. As we saw above, for close to ,.
Suppose that a function has its tangent line approximation given by at the point , but we do not know anything else about the function . To estimate a value of for near 1, such as , we can use the fact that and hence
We emphasize that is simply a new name for the tangent line function. Using this new notation and our observation that for near , it follows that we can write
From Activity 1.8.2, we see that the local linearization is a linear function that shares two important values with the function that it is derived from. In particular,
Hence, for every value of , and specifically . Therefore, we see that is a linear function that has both the same value and the same slope as the function at the point .
Thus, if we know the linear approximation for a function, we know the original function’s value and its slope at the point of tangency. What remains unknown, however, is the shape of the function at the point of tangency. There are essentially four possibilities, as shown in Figure 1.8.4.
The plots in Figure 1.8.4 highlight yet another important thing that we can learn from the concavity of the graph near the point of tangency: whether the tangent line lies above or below the curve itself. This is key because it tells us whether or not the tangent line approximation’s values will be too large or too small in comparison to the true value of . For instance, in the first situation in the leftmost plot in Figure 1.8.4 where , because the tangent line falls below the curve, we know that for all values of near .
Sketch a possible graph of near on the lefthand grid in Figure 1.8.5. Include a sketch of (found in part (a)). Explain how you know the graph of looks like you have drawn it.
The idea that a differentiable function looks linear and can be well-approximated by a linear function is an important one that finds wide application in calculus. For example, by approximating a function with its local linearization, it is possible to develop an effective algorithm to estimate the zeroes of a function. Local linearity also helps us to make further sense of certain challenging limits. For instance, we have seen that the limit
is indeterminate, because both its numerator and denominator tend to 0. While there is no algebra that we can do to simplify , it is straightforward to show that the linearization of at the point is given by . Hence, for values of near 0, , and therefore
The principle of local linearity tells us that if we zoom in on a point where a function is differentiable, the function will be indistinguishable from its tangent line. That is, a differentiable function looks linear when viewed up close. We rename the tangent line to be the function , where . Thus, for all near .
If we know the tangent line approximation to a function , then because and , we also know the values of both the function and its derivative at the point where . In other words, the linear approximation tells us the height and slope of the original function. If, in addition, we know the value of , we then know whether the tangent line lies above or below the graph of , depending on the concavity of .
Use linear approximation, i.e. the tangent line, to approximate as follows: Let and find the equation of the tangent line to at a "nice" point near . Then use this to approximate .
A potato is placed in an oven, and the potato’s temperature (in degrees Fahrenheit) at various points in time is taken and recorded in the following table. Time is measured in minutes.
An object moving along a straight line path has a differentiable position function ; measures the object’s position relative to the origin at time . It is known that at time seconds, the object’s position is feet (i.e., 4 feet to the right of the origin). Furthermore, the object’s instantaneous velocity at is feet per second, and its acceleration at the same instant is feet per second per second.
Use local linearity to estimate the position of the object at .
In everyday language, describe the behavior of the moving object at . Is it moving toward the origin or away from it? Is its velocity increasing or decreasing?
Assuming that , estimate the value of by finding and using the tangent line approximation to at . Is your estimate larger or smaller than the true value of ? Justify your answer.