Recall that the derivative of a function can be used to find the slopes of lines tangent to the graph of . At , the tangent line to the graph of has equation
The graph portrays in its typical wave-like form, beginning from . A tangent line intersects the curve at , giving us an insight into the function’s behavior around this point. A small rectangular region on the graph suggests a section of interest, likely to be examined more closely in a subsequent depiction. The overall visualization offers a comprehensive understanding of the sine function’s progression and how the tangent line serves as a useful approximation around .
(a)
Zooming in on the small rectangle from the prior graph, we get a magnified view around the point for and its tangent line. This zoomed-in perspective demonstrates the precision with which the tangent line estimates at . We can see how points on the tangent line lie quite close to the graph of , illustrating the fact that the tangent line gives a good approximation to the original graph, near the point where it meets the graph.
(b)
Figure4.4.2.Graphing and its tangent line at in order to estimate
In Figure 4.4.2.(a), we see a graph of graphed along with its tangent line at . The small rectangle shows the region that is displayed in Figure 4.4.2.(b). In this figure, we see how we are approximating with the tangent line, evaluated at . Together, the two figures show how close these values are.
We now generalize this concept. Given and an -value , the tangent line is , where . Clearly, . Let be a small number, representing a small change in the -value. We assert that:
since the tangent line to a function approximates well the values of that function near . In fact, the tangent line is the graph of the linear function that best approximates the value of for near . Because of its value in applications, we give it a name.
This final equation is important; it becomes the basis of Definition 4.4.5 and Key Idea 4.4.7. In short, it says that when the -value changes from to , the value of a function changes by about .
Let be differentiable. The differential of , denoted , is any nonzero real number (usually taken to be a small number). The differential of , denoted , is
We can solve for in the above equation: . This states that the derivative of with respect to is the differential of divided by the differential of ; this is not the alternate notation for the derivative, . This latter notation was chosen because of the fraction-like qualities of the derivative, but again, it is one symbol and not a fraction.
When students first encounter differentials, they are often left wondering why and are different, while and are the same. The video in Figure 4.4.8 attempts to offer an explanation.
What is the value of differentials? Like many mathematical concepts, differentials provide both practical and theoretical benefits. We explore both here.
The -value is changing from to ; therefore, we see that . If we know how much the -value changes from to (i.e., if we know ), we will know exactly what is (since we already know ). We can approximate with .
.
We expect the -value to change by about , so we approximate .
We leave it to the reader to verify this, but the preceding discussion links the differential to the tangent line of at . One can verify that the tangent line, evaluated at , also gives .
Of course, it is easy to compute the actual answer (by hand or with a calculator): . (Before we get too cynical and say “Then why bother?”, note our approximation is really good!)
In “most” real life situations, we do not know the function that describes a particular behavior. Instead, we can only take measurements of how things change — measurements of the derivative.
Imagine water flowing down a winding channel. It is easy to measure the speed and direction (i.e., the velocity) of water at any location. It is very hard to create a function that describes the overall flow, hence it is hard to predict where a floating object placed at the beginning of the channel will end up. However, we can approximate the path of an object using differentials. Over small intervals, the path taken by a floating object is essentially linear. Differentials allow us to approximate the true path by piecing together lots of short, linear paths. This technique is called Euler’s Method, studied in introductory Differential Equations courses.
We use differentials once more to approximate the value of a function. Even though calculators are very accessible, it is neat to see how these techniques can sometimes be used to easily compute something that looks rather hard.
quite often. While we don’t discuss here what all of that notation means, note the existence of the differential . Proper handling of integrals comes with proper handling of differentials.
Finding the differential of is really no harder than finding the derivative of ; we just multiply by . It is important to remember that we are not simply adding the symbol “” at the end.
We have seen a practical use of differentials as they offer a good method of making certain approximations. Another use is error propagation. Suppose a length is measured to be , although the actual value is (where is the error, which we hope is small). This measurement of may be used to compute some other value; we can think of this latter value as for some function . As the true length is , one really should have computed . The difference between and is the propagated error.
Example4.4.12.Using differentials to approximate propagated error.
A steel ball bearing is to be manufactured with a diameter of 2 cm. The manufacturing process has a tolerance of mm in the diameter. Given that the density of steel is about 7.85 g⁄cm3, estimate the propagated error in the mass of the ball bearing.
The mass of a ball bearing is found using the equation “mass = volume × density.” In this situation the mass function is a product of the radius of the ball bearing, hence it is . The differential of the mass is
.
The radius is to be 1 cm; the manufacturing tolerance in the radius is mm, or cm. The propagated error is approximately:
g
Is this error significant? It certainly depends on the application, but we can get an idea by computing the relative error. The ratio between amount of error to the total mass is
,
or .
We leave it to the reader to confirm this, but if the diameter of the ball was supposed to be 10 cm, the same manufacturing tolerance would give a propagated error in mass of g, which corresponds to a percent error of . While the amount of error is much greater (), the percent error is much lower.
A set of plastic spheres are to be made with a diameter of . If the manufacturing process is accurate to , what is the propagated error in volume of the spheres?
The distance, in feet, a stone drops in seconds is given by . The depth of a hole is to be approximated by dropping a rock and listening for it to hit the bottom. What is the propagated error if the time measurement is accurate to of a second and the measured time is:
A wall is to be painted that is high and is measured to be long. Find the propagated error in the measurement of the wall’s surface area if the measurement is accurate to .
The following exercises explore some issues related to surveying in which distances are approximated using other measured distances and measured angles. (Hint: Convert all angles to radians before computing.)
The length of a long wall is to be approximated. The angle , as shown in the diagram (not to scale), is measured at a distance of 25 feet from the wall, and found to be , accurate to . Assume that the triangle formed is a right triangle.
The length of a long wall is to be approximated. The angle , as shown in the diagram (not to scale), is measured at a distance of 100 feet from the wall, and found to be , accurate to . Assume that the triangle formed is a right triangle.
The length of a long wall is to be calculated by measuring the angle shown in the diagram (not to scale) at a distance of 50 feet from the wall. Assume the formed triangle is an isosceles triangle. The measured angle is , accurate to .