This statement is false. Our counterexample should satisfy the negation of the statement: and Find small sets that satisfy the negation.
Section 6.3 Algebraic Proofs and Counterexamples
The proofs we did in the last section involved looking at elements in sets. We could translate statements about sets into logical statement such as “and”s, “or”s, and conditionals. This allowed us to prove many other properties of sets, such as DeMorgan’s Laws. But now that we have these properties, we can use them to prove new properties in a more algebraic way.
First we look at how to disprove statements involving sets. As we saw in Section 4.1, we can disprove a statement with a counterexample.
To prove a statement is false, give a specific counterexample. This means defining specific sets for which the property fails. If you are trying to decide if a statement is true or false, you can experiment with small sets, or you can draw a Venn diagram. The Venn diagram itself is not a proof or a counterexample. But it can help you decide which you should be trying to find.
Example 6.3.1. Finding a Counterexample.
Advice for finding counterexamples:
-
Write the negation of the statement so you can make sure your sets satisfy the appropriate conditions.
-
Most counterexamples for the types of statements we see in this chapter can be found without needing to find “tricky” sets. So just try something, it will probably work.
-
You might need to be careful about whether your sets intersect or not.
-
If you need counterexamples that involve set complements, it is helpful to define a small universal set such as
Then if which is easier to work with than, say, all the integers except 1, 2, 3.
Now we want to be able to use the list of properties from the end of the previous section, Summary of Set Identities, to prove statements algebraically. In this case, we do not need to use elements, but we can use properties such as the distributive property or DeMorgan’s Laws to rewrite our sets.
Activity 6.3.1.
Activity 6.3.2.
Activity 6.3.3.
Example 6.3.3. Power Set Proof.
Prove for all sets and
You might have noticed in this last proof that each of the subset proofs are really just the reverse of each other. If all the implications in our proof are really “if and only if” statements, then we can write the proof more succinctly as a single “if and only if” proof. We will show this technique in the next example. Be careful with if and only if proofs, though. Make sure that at each step both directions of the conditional are true. If you are unsure, you can always write you proof in two stages, as we did in the previous example. We generally use the symbol to mean “if and only if” in proofs.
Since we are looking at the power set, we can prove a formula for counting the number of elements of a power set. In this proof we will revisit proof by induction. The number of elements in a set, is denoted .
Theorem 6.3.5.
Proof.
We will prove this by induction on the number of elements,
Base step: Let Then since has 0 elements, The only subset of the empty set is Thus, Hence, Since if has elements.
Proof of induction step: Assume Let then where the set of elements of except Then has elements, so by the induction assumption,
Now consider the subsets of Each subset either contains or it doesn’t. We know there are subsets that do not contain We get all the subsets of that do contain by adding to the sets that don’t contain Thus, there are the same number of subsets that do contain as those that don’t. Hence, we have subsets not containing and subsets containing
The next example demonstrates the proof of Theorem 6.3.5 in a specific set.
Example 6.3.6. Counting the Number of Subsets.
We can look at the subsets of that do not contain 3:
Now add 3 to each of these sets:
You can check that we have all the possible subsets of
If we count up the sets, we have subsets not containing 3, and subsets containing 3. Which gives us subsets of Hence,
Reading Questions Check Your Understanding
1.
True.
False.
2.
True.
False.
3.
Give a counterexample to disprove
4.
Give a counterexample to disprove
5.
Give a counterexample to disprove
6.
Give a counterexample to disprove
7.
Give a counterexample to disprove
8.
Give a counterexample to disprove
9.
Exercises Exercises
1.
Find a counterexample to show the following statement is false:
2.
Write a negation for the following statements. Indicate which is true, the statement or the negation. Justify your answer.
3.
Let and for each integer let be the set of all subsets of that have elements. List the elements in Is a partition of
4.
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ |
5.
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ | ||
by ___ |
6.
7.
8.
9.
10.
11.
12.
13.
14.
Simplify the statement using algebraic properties:
You have attempted 1 of 10 activities on this page.